Human rights in India
by
Both sides in the bloody Kashmir separatist conflict have been responsible for human rights abuses, but attacks on civilians by Indian government security forces have been marked by particularly wanton cruelty. Authorized to shoot to kill in their efforts to …
- ● 94% match for you
the long version
Both sides in the bloody Kashmir separatist conflict have been responsible for human rights abuses, but attacks on civilians by Indian government security forces have been marked by particularly wanton cruelty. Authorized to shoot to kill in their efforts to crush the militant separatist movement. Indian army soldiers and federal paramilitary troops of the Central Reserve Police Force and the Border Security Force have used lethal weapons against peaceful demonstrators, shooting scores of unarmed civilians. Government forces have also engaged in the summary execution of captured militants, warrantless house-to-house searches during which entire families are seized and beaten, and the wholesale destruction of civilian propert. Militant organizations are also guilty of crimes against civilians, engaging in summary executions, targeted assassinations and the indiscriminate use of bombs and grenades in public places.
Margaret's verdict
"Both sides in the bloody Kashmir separatist conflict have been responsible for human rights abuses, but attacks on civilians by Indian government security forces have been marked by particularly wanton …"
highlights
what readers held onto
No highlights yet. Be the first.
discussion
what readers said
No reviews yet. Finish it; tell us what you found.