Real natures and familiar objects
por
"In Real Natures and Familiar Objects, Crawford Elder defends, with qualifications, the ontology of common sense. He argues that we exist - that no gloss is necessary for the statement "human beings exist" to show that it is true of …
- ● 81% match for you
the long version
"In Real Natures and Familiar Objects, Crawford Elder defends, with qualifications, the ontology of common sense. He argues that we exist - that no gloss is necessary for the statement "human beings exist" to show that it is true of this world as it really is - and that we are surrounded by many of the medium-sized objects in which common sense believes. He argues further that these familiar medium-sized objects not only exist, but have essential properties, which we are often able to determine by observation. The starting point of his argument is that ontology should operate under empirical load - that is, it should give special weight to the objects and properties that we treat as real in our best predictions and explanations of what happens in the world. Elder calls this presumption "mildly controversial" because it entails that arguments are needed for certain widely measured positions such as "mereological universalism" (according to which the sum of randomly assembled objects constitutes an object in its own right)."--Jacket.
Margaret's verdict
""In Real Natures and Familiar Objects, Crawford Elder defends, with qualifications, the ontology of common sense. He argues that we exist - that no gloss is necessary for the statement …"
highlights
what readers held onto
No highlights yet. Be the first.
discussion
what readers said
No reviews yet. Finish it; tell us what you found.